Ernie :
A couple of observations--
( 1 ) you'd probably feel right at home if you went back to school and  
majored in 
social science. Very astute social-sciency observation, spoken like a true  
Durkheimian.
Or maybe like a Weberian, well, you get the idea. Nice typology, and it  
may--
mirable dictu--  be something new. I'd need to do some searching but  this 
is my first reaction.
( 2 ) there are different ways to tackle the problem of confirmation of  
your hypothesis.
I'd start with an analysis of the Qur'an  --the core text-- and look  for 
passages
that are directly relevant, After that you could look at the historical  
record,
especially the evolution of Shariah jurisprudence. Then as part of the  
process
would be a "popular  culture" analysis, best done region by region  since 
Muslims
of South Asia can be different than those of the Mid East. etc
 
Nice work.
 
Billy
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/14/2009 7:20:15 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Hi  all,

As Billy and I were discussing Hinduism offline, it occurred to  me:

"Religions generally tolerate each other when they don't perceive  
existential threats, but react violently when they do."

I think this is  a fairly robust statement, and covers the vast majority of 
cases pretty well.  There are probably exceptions, but not very many.  (In 
fact, you could  probably substitute almost any entity for "religion" and 
get the same result.  :-).

I would actually agree with Billy that Islam is inherently worse  in this 
regard than others.  I'm less concerned with "why", though, than  "how".  
Specifically, is the problem that Islam:

a) Defines its  existence very broadly?

b) Has a low threshold for perceived  threats?

c) Has few built-in checks to inhibit a recourse to  violence?

Or (aha moment!) maybe the unique problem is that Islam has  all three, 
while other major religions (relatively speaking) only have one or  two.

For example, Christianity is very expansive in its self-definition  (a), 
but biased towards pacifism (c). 

This seems of both academic and  practical interest, so I'd be curious if 
more could be done with  it...

-- Ernie  P.

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing  list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/



_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to