On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:21 PM, David R. Block
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  I personally don't think that it helps the cause of Islam to have all of
> those passages in the Koran that could basically be called "death to the
> infidels" passages. These passages are relatively frequent and are not toned
> down by later passages. It is my understanding that they become more
> frequent instead of less as one goes on. The Old Testament has some of
> those, too, but they are generally directed towards nations at a given time
> and not permanent in nature. The New Testament comes along and modifies the
> Old and those passages usually aren't referenced therein.
>

I understood Qu'ran more as a historical biography than codes of law. It
talks a lot about the culture at that time, both directly and indirectly,
like a current and social affair column than anything else (maybe not too
far from a court minutes but definitely not like a Constitution). Understood
in that way, the offensive passages seem less offensive than when they are
read and interpreted verse by verse as it is (literally).

I also find the notes and commentaries written by translator helpful in
understanding the context of verse, though I must suspect that the
translator (being apologetic towards Islam) might tend to explain the book
more positive than necessary. One interesting observation is that I realize
a few 'disputably straight' offensive verses were not commented, which led
me to wonder if the translator purposely left them untouched. He probably
knew of the happening during when Mohammad recited the Qu'ran and felt those
verses were obsolete, according to today's context, and didn't bother
explaining them. But we'll never know.

Whatever religion it can be, I think taking a book as binding law is a
spiritual downfall. This just bound to misguide some clueless into more
madness.
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to