Hear, hear. Guns don't kill people, etc. But more importantly, *Second Amendment rights*. Because we have the right to protect ourselves from tyrannical government. Anyone who says we don't need that protection is ignorant of history and doomed to repeat it.
-Kevin On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:10 PM, David R. Block <[email protected]>wrote: > Britain has strict gun control. It is almost to the point that only > criminals have guns. > > That is the problem with most "gun control." The ones who abide by > registration, permits, etc, are NOT the ones you need to worry about. Which > is why it does not make sense. The people who have guns that you need to > control aren't going to cooperate, no matter what you do. They're going to > break the law, and what's breaking one more law to them? It's not like they > care or something. :-) > > David > > "Suppose you were an idiot; and suppose you were a member of > Congress...ah, but I repeat myself."*—Mark Twain* > > > > On 1/23/2010 5:55 PM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote: > > Hi Billy, > > On Jan 23, 2010, at 2:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Well, yeah. I agree about self defense. Still, running around with guns, > uhhh, > the potential to use them in other circumstances isn't academic. When a > population > gets into the militia habit, maybe 100 % justified at first, that means > trouble. > And, face it, some % of "Christians" simply identify with their community > and that's mostly the whole schmeer for them. We see this in the USA > all over the place. It wouldn't be different elsewhere. > > If we could say "genuine Christians" and know how to distinguish them > from " identity Christians," all would be well, but how are you - > how is anyone- going to be able to do that ? > > > Genuine or not, I agree with you, armed populations tend to create a lot > of mischief. Then agree, I think DRB would argue that is overall a *good* > thing. :-) > > > Billy > > ==================================================== > > > > In a message dated 1/23/2010 2:25:51 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > A sad development, but arguably justified. Heck, I think DRB was > planning something similar in Texas us Health Care passed. :-/ > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 23, 2010, at 12:04, [email protected] wrote: > > Rogers added that resistance groups were fighting to defend their > > people. > > > > “Individual Christians who have joined the armed ethnic groups do so > > out of a perfectly biblical concept of just war, the right to defen > > d your people from gross injustice.” > > > > Added an FBR source, “In Burma, no one protects except the pro-democ > > racy resistance groups, and all relief inside the country is only po > > ssible because of them.” > > > > _______________________________________________ > Centroids mailing list: [email protected] > http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com > Archives at > http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Centroids mailing list: [email protected] > http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com > Archives at > http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Centroids mailing list: > [email protected]http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com > Archives at > http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Centroids mailing list: [email protected] > http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com > Archives at > http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
