Indian Court Rules Born and Unborn Are Equal
"The foetus is another life in a woman and loss of the foetus is actually  
loss of a child"


By Thaddeus M. Baklinski 
NEW DELHI, February 9, 2010 (_LifeSiteNews.com_ 
(http://www.lifesitenews.com/) ) - The Delhi High Court  has ruled that an 
unborn child can be 
considered equivalent to a minor child and  has directed an insurance company 
to pay 
compensation of 250,000 rupees (about  $5750 Canadian) to a man who lost 
his pregnant wife in a road accident a year  and half ago. 
Justice J R Midha allowed an appeal filed by a Mr. Prakash seeking  
compensation for the death of his unborn child when his plea was ignored by the 
 
Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT), which rules on insurance claim disputes 
in  India. 
"This court holds that an unborn child — aged five months onwards in the  
mother’s womb till its birth — is treated as equal to a child ... the fetus 
is  another life in a woman and loss of the fetus is actually loss of a 
child in the  offing," Justice Midha stated. 
The Delhi High Court ruling followed a precedent set by the Kerala High  
Court’s verdict of October 2008 involving an identical issue, when it had  
ordered the payment of separate compensation for the death of an unborn child 
to  the husband of a pregnant woman, who died in a road accident. 
Prior to the Kerala High Court’s verdict, courts in India generally held 
that  compensation for the death of an unborn child could only be paid in case 
of a  miscarriage by the mother who survived an accident - but no separate 
claim was  allowed for an unborn child if the mother had died.  
The Delhi court heard that the MACT had already awarded 611,000 rupees to 
Mr  Prakash for the accident in which his wife died with their 
seven-month-old child  in her womb, but refused to take into account the death 
of the 
child. 
Counsel for MACT said that the "post-mortem report did not mention anything 
 about the presence of a fetus." 
Clarifying that the unborn child was absent at the time of the victim’s  
death, counsel for Mr. Prakash explained to the court that as a result of the  
accident that took place on June 8, 2008, the child Mrs Prakash was 
carrying  died and was removed from her womb by Caesarean section on June 17. 
Following  this Mrs. Prakash died from her injuries on August 14. 
"The appeal is allowed and the compensation of 250,000 rupees along with  
interest at 7.5 per annum...is awarded to the appellant (Prakash) towards the 
 death of a seven month-old foetus on June 17,2008," the Court judgment  
said.
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to