Title: ORourke1 Signature
Republican opposition was perverse? Really?

Obama stuffed them early and often and only toward the last few months did some head fakes in their direction. The Democrats on the Hill locked them completely out of the closed door meetings.

Their input was ignored totally on ideological grounds. This bill is the first step on the Road to Serfdom.

Nothing is infinitely preferable to this bill from where I sit.

David

"A pleasant natural environment is a good - a luxury good, philosophical good, a moral goody-good, a good time for all. Whatever, we want it. If we want something, we should pay for it, with our labor or our cash. We shouldn't beg it, steal it, sit around wishing for it, or euchre the government into taking it by force."--P. J. O’Rourke

On 3/22/2010 1:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Ernie:
Token "socialist," yes, but a Saint-Simonian not a Marxist ( "neo" or anything else ).
Saint-Simonianism refers to what might better be called Capitalist-Socialist,
a hybrid system that seeks public good through a blend of private enterprise
and elected officials who take their responsibilities for the people they
represent seriously ( objectively ) rather than ideologically.
 
But about the current bill, to be candid about it, it seems to me to be excessively
partisan. Do we need health care reform ? We have needed it since the era of FDR.
But it would have been far better to seek market solutions as much as possible
instead of essentially as Democratic concessions to the GOP. Such as creating
competition among insurance companies by allowing choice of health plans
across state lines. This seems so totally obvious that it boggles the mind
that it wasn't done. But where was discussion on the objective merits ?
The Democrats didn't seem able to do any such thing because
of their mindset.
 
This said, a public option was also called for, which I have always regarded as
absolutely necessary, and about that the Democrats fought each other
to such an extent that it became impossible given Republican
opposition. That opposition struck me as utterly perverse.
 
Bottom line, along the way I became so disgusted with the whole process
that I eventually tuned it out almost completely since whatever came of the debate
it would be  capitulation to special interests , little conservative input, and
what you'd expect from lawyers. 
 
And what the hell do student loans have to do with health care ?
 
Is the bill better than nothing ?  I suppose so, but is that the best that could be done ?
What a joke and what an insult to the whole country. But you'd never know it
from media accounts which, true to form, are praising the result as salvific.
 
We got a compromise .A bad compromise at that. Essentially Congress makes me sick
--for which the health care bill provides no remedy.
 
Billy
 
========================================================
 
 
In a message dated 3/22/2010 10:01:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:

I tend to agree that whatever its political significance, the current bill is a non-event in terms of truly transforming health care delivery.  We can only hope that whatever happens will encourage rather than discourage innovation.

Billy, you're our token socialist -- what do you think of the bill?

-- Ernie P.




Health Care Reform Passes--Now Let's Start Health Care Innovation

Posted by: Bruce Nussbaum on March 22, 2010

To the surprise of many, Congress passed legislation this weekend that extended US healthcare to nearly everyone in the country. Bravo. The US joins the 19th century. The next trick is to try actual innovation in health care that lowers costs and increases the healthcare experience for Americans. There is almost nothing in the bill passed that does that.

The US already spends far more on healthcare innovation than any other country. But government healthcare R&D has gone into life sciences that haven’t paid off (genome) or advanced medical procedures that are extremely expensive and help extremely few people. In terms of longevity, the US lags Europe and Asia.

US healthcare needs platform innovation that uses social media to connect people to the medical system in new, cheaper, more personal and more productive ways. Hello Health is one way to go. It’s founder, Dr. Jay Parkinson, has just launched The Future Well, a design consultancy that promises to extend the new social media model for wellbeing across the country.

US healthcare also needs the kind of demassing and decentralization that design and innovation consultants can provide. Memorial Sloan- Kettering (MSK) did workshops with students at the Parsons School for Design to come up with small, inexpensive, neighborhood chemo centers and it just completed the first in Brooklyn.

The Mayo Clinic is innovating broadly in health care.

Clayton Christensen has a great book on The Innovator’s Prescription that calls for disruptive innovation in healthcare based on new business models. This is a very important book.

Now that the US has extended healthcare to all its citizens, the next step is to cut costs and improve outcomes and experiences by harnessing the best thinking of designers and innovators. Most of the concepts and tools are already at hand.



=

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
 
_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/



_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to