opinion Houston, we have a real problem By Ed Perlmutter and Pete Olson The Denver Post Posted: 04/05/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT
There has been much speculation about the future of NASA without Constellation and ORION. But this goes beyond the future of NASA, to the future of America as a whole. No one needs to be reminded of the motivation and imagination that human space flight has inspired. Many a career in science, engineering or math began with a young child dreaming of space flight while watching man explore outer space on TV. The administration's decision to kill NASA's Constellation and ORION programs isn't just the death knell for U.S. human space exploration, it is also a decision to place America's space program in the category of second or even third in the world. America's dominance in space has always been so much more than a race to be first. It has signaled our nation's commitment to forge paths once unimaginable. Scientific and technological discoveries are born from both necessity and risk-taking. As has been said many times, it is not the destination but the journey. The journey of space exploration has taken the United States to global leadership on many fronts. Our dominance in human space coincided with our status as a superpower. That is no accident. Our commitment to be the best in national security and space exploration go hand in hand. That is why there has long been bipartisan support for NASA and human space flight. The economic, scientific and technological returns far exceeded our investment. Observations from space have provided GPS, meteorological forecasts, predictions and management of hurricanes and other natural disasters, as well as surveillance and intelligence. Royalties on NASA patents and licenses go directly to the U.S. Treasury. NASA has been a solid investment because it does so much with so little. Ending human space flight is a major setback for our country. It could set us back 50 years and force us to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to get Americans into space, by relying on Russia and other nations for a ride. It is important to remember that this budget path shifts taxpayer resources from NASA, the only entity with a track record in human space, and hands it to unproven commercial entities to reinvent what we already achieved. This is not a savings; it is a wasteful redirection of taxpayer funds. Is human space exploration worth it? If not, why are nations like China and India ramping up their programs? Clearly they know what America has known for years: The direct investment alone is worth the cost, and the indirect benefits lead to economic drivers and scientific discoveries that far exceed expectations. NASA has long been a cradle for innovation. Without human space flight, where is the incentive for future scientists and engineers to take up these careers? Yet human space flight is so much more than the basis for an inspirational movie. It is the heart of American ingenuity and pioneering that has placed our nation at the forefront of technology and science. We must make the commitment, so that America will stay No. 1. U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter, far left, is a Colorado Democrat, and U.S. Rep. Pete Olson is a Texas Republican. Read more: _http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_14819639#ixzz0kFN3FAwN_ (http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_14819639#ixzz0kFN3FAwN)
_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
