"Everything  government touches turns to crap"--Ringo  Starr
The Interstate  highway system ? The Arpenet which became the  internet?
The CDC and protection against  epidemics? Local fire departments ?
Sanitation systems for several  thousand cities ? Etc, etc, into the
thousands of examples of  "virtuous government."
 
This said, and granting that the  Democratic Party's idea of social values
is generally hideous and insane,  just where are we to get the values
which make viable markets  possible ? Adam Smith did say, after all,
that a market divorced from a  source of moral values can only result 
in a malfunctioning  market.
 
And Lord knows that the market  system, even if it is good in principle,
is ( 1 ) essentially void of  feelings of common good, ( 2 ) is only 
self-correcting usually,  but far from always, and ( 3 ) can be manipulated 
in 100 different ways by players with no higher interest than  maximizing 
profits.
 
OK, so where do we get the  values that compel markets to show
at least some minimum of  mortality ?  Structurally, not by reason
of good intentions. What is the  practical solution ?
 
Any thoughts ?  
 
Billy
 
======================================================
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 4/23/2010 7:13:27 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

And as the SEC has shown, bureaucrats and  regulators are easily distracted 
by internet porn. So the regulations don't  help a whole lot if the police 
are sitting in their offices watching "Debbie  Does Dallas" instead of 
watching Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Goldman  Sachs, et al. 

Government: the last refuge of the incompetent (and,  apparently, office 
porn viewing). But I understand that it's starting to pay  better. And 
apparently, you can spend 8 hours a day surfing porn sites.  

So hooray for higher paid incompetent regulators.... Oh  wait....

David

  _   
 
"Everything  government touches turns to crap"--Ringo  Starr 



On 4/23/2010 11:57 AM,  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  


natrionalreview online
 
 
April 23, 2010 4:00 A.M.Goldman Sachs and  the Left 
An impressionistic study in  cronyism.


President Obama was in the Big Apple on  Thursday, for another lecture on 
big, bad Wall Street. The dutiful,  third-row appearance by Lloyd Blankfein, 
Goldman Sachs’s CEO, said it all:  More than any other firm, Goldman is 
confident in its ability to cozy up to  the Democrats that regulate it, and 
to favorably shape the current  congressional negotiations on _financial_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432367/goldman-sachs-and-the-left/robert-cost
a?page=1#)   reform.

 
 
"They’ve been wired through the Clinton years, the Bush years, and  
before that, they have a lot of heavy hitters,” Rep. Peter DeFazio (D.,  
Ore.) 
tells us. “They’re well connected. . . . They’re aggressive.”  
DeFazio, along with Rep. Elijah Cummings (D., Md.), urged the Securities and  
Exchange _Commission_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432367/goldman-sachs-and-the-left/robert-costa?page=1#)
  this  week to widen its current 
investigation of the firm to include securities  underwritten by Goldman and 
backed by American International Group, the  bailed-out insurer, to probe for 
“
fraudulent conduct” and “ill-gotten  gains.”
 
“From the beginning, I’ve thought that the deal Goldman Sachs got  
via Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner on their bad bets through AIG kind of  
stunk,” DeFazio says. “They got $13 billion from AIG last year. I’m  
looking for any legal way to recoup that money for the people of the United  
States.”

With former senior aides  to Obama, Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.), the 
chairman of the House Financial  Services Committee, and other Democrats on its 
payroll, Goldman isn’t  fretting about DeFazio and company. As Timothy 
Carney of the Washington Examiner _reports_ 
(http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obama_s-cronies-thrive-at-intersection-of-K-and-Wall-84514142.html)
 , four of the  five in-house lobbyists at Goldman were Democratic staffers 
on Capitol Hill,  with the remaining one a contributor to Hillary Clinton’
s presidential  campaign. Directing Goldman’s Washington shop is Michael 
Paese, Frank’s  former go-to committee staffer, who had responsibility 
for committee policy  related to the banking, securities, and _insurance_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432367/goldman-sachs-and-the-left/robert-cost
a?page=1#)   industries. One of Paese’s deputies is Ken Connolly, a 
veteran of the  Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. And this week, 
Paese’s  bosses enlisted Greg Craig, Obama’s former White House counsel, 
through  the law firm Skadden Arps, just days after Goldman was charged 
with fraud by  the SEC.

The relationship between the  government and Goldman is fluid and open. 
Frank’s staff, for one, is a  training ground for big-banking lobbyists, and 
Goldman remains a soft  landing spot for supportive ex-officials and former 
policymakers. Peter  Roberson, who worked on the Boston congressman’s 
capital-markets team,  recently left the House _Finance_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432367/goldman-sachs-and-the-left/robert-costa?page=1#)
   
Committee’s staff to join the world’s top clearinghouse for  
over-the-counter derivatives. Frank himself admits that the revolving door  is 
unseemly. 
After Roberson quit, Frank publicly criticized him, a little  tantrum to 
hide bigger problems.

Over  on Pennsylvania Avenue, the White House has friendships with many 
senior  Goldman lobbyists outside of the bank’s immediate team of Washington 
 operatives: former House minority leader Dick Gephardt; Janice O’
Connell,  a former adviser to Chris Dodd (D., Conn.), the chairman of the 
Senate  
Banking Committee; and former Tennessee congressman Harold Ford Sr., to  
name a few. Another Goldman-enlisted Washington warrior is Steve Elmendorf,  
John Kerry’s deputy campaign manager in 2004. Prominent Republicans, of  
course, are also part of the operation, with Ken Duberstein, a Reagan White  
House chief of staff, and Eric Ueland, former chief of staff to Bill Frist,  
the former Senate majority leader, on board. Altogether, the bank employs 41 
 lobbyists and 13 outside firms.
 
According to the Hill, Goldman has devoted $18  million over the last 
decade to lobbying members of Congress and “millions  more to contributing to 
lawmakers’ campaigns.” It’s an immense,  sprawling operation, buoyed 
by countless buddies inside the Obama  administration, as _detailed_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432085/obama-and-goldman-sachs/michelle-malkin)
 
 by Michelle  Malkin earlier this week. Senior officials such as Mark 
Patterson, Tim  Geithner’s chief of staff, are former Goldman lobbyists. 
Patterson, in  fact, had Paese’s position before Paese.

Analysis by the Christian Science  Monitor shows that Goldman increased its 
lobbying by more than 70  percent over the past year, spending $2.8 million 
in the process, and it  doesn’t end with Goldman. According to Public 
Citizen, a Washington, D.C.,  watchdog group, 940 former public officials are 
now registered lobbyists on  behalf of banks and investment houses. The 
Center for Responsive Politics  counts 56 former congressional aides on the 
Senate and House Banking  Committees who went on to lobby for the _financial_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432367/goldman-sachs-and-the-left/robert-cos
ta?page=2#)   sector. For Goldman, the intermingling is policy. A company 
insider tells  Politico that the firm’s Washington operation is  “a 
very conscious, long-term effort that is very deliberate and is  intended to 
address this two-pronged need of understanding the political  process and 
understanding our business.”

For all of his talk about reforming Wall Street,  President Obama has been 
powerless to stop the influence of lobbyists on his  financial agenda, 
preferring to put his hand out, rather than up — his  presidential campaign 
collected more than $1 million from Goldman employees,  a wad of dough the 
president refuses to return. Obama’s hesitancy to  return his bundle of 
Goldman cash is shared by Senate majority leader Harry  Reid (D., Nev.), who 
was 
recently hosted by Goldman’s president at a  fundraiser in _New York_ 
(http://article.nationalreview.com/432367/goldman-sachs-and-the-left/robert-cos
ta?page=2#) . Other  tentacles slither throughout the Democratic caucus. 
Since 1990, according to  _OpenSecrets.org_ 
(http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000085) ,  Goldman has 
donated over $31 million to 
political-action committees and  candidates, with 64 percent of those donations 
going to Democrats.

Despite’s Obama’s tough words at the  Cooper Union, the symbiosis 
between Goldman’s lobbyists and the Democrats  that regulate it has long 
been a work of political impressionism. Close up,  it looks disconnected and 
blurred, but if you step back, the shape of it all  falls into focus: 
Democrats hoard Goldman cash, Goldman hoards Democrats,  and the American 
people 
lose.


_______________________________________________

Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 

_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com) 

Archives at 
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/) 

  



_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to