Hi Stefan,
deep buffers means latency spikes, you should go for fast switching
latency. The HP5900 has a latency of 1ms, the Arista and Mellanox of 250ns.
And I you should think at the price the HP5900 cost 3 times of the Mellanox.
-martin
Am 07.11.2012 22:44, schrieb Stefan Priebe:
Am 07.11.2012 22:35, schrieb Martin Mailand:
Hi,
I tested a Arista 7150S-24, a HP5900 and in a few weeks I will get a
Mellanox MSX1016. ATM the Arista is may favourite.
For the dual 10GeB NICs I tested the Intel X520-DA2 and the Mellanox
ConnectX-3. My favourite is the Intel X520-DA2.
That's pretty interesting i'll get the HP5900 and HP5920 in a few weeks.
HP told me the deep packet buffers of the HP5920 will burst the
performance and should be used for storage related stuff.
Greets,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
