> FYI I'm using 450 pgs for my pools.
Please, can you show the number of object replicas?

ceph osd dump | grep 'rep size'

Vlad Gorbunov

2013/3/5 Sébastien Han <han.sebast...@gmail.com>:
> FYI I'm using 450 pgs for my pools.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sébastien Han.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Sage Weil <s...@inktank.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> > On 02/23/2013 01:44 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > I finally got a core dump.
>> > > >
>> > > > I did it with a kill -SEGV on the OSD process.
>> > > >
>> > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/ahv6hm0ipnak5rf/core-ceph-osd-11-0-0-20100-1361539008
>> > > >
>> > > > Hope we will get something out of it :-).
>> > >
>> > > AHA!  We have a theory.  The pg log isnt trimmed during scrub (because 
>> > > teh
>> > > old scrub code required that), but the new (deep) scrub can take a very
>> > > long time, which means the pg log will eat ram in the meantime..
>> > > especially under high iops.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Does the number of PGs influence the memory leak? So my theory is that when
>> > you have a high number of PGs with a low number of objects per PG you don't
>> > see the memory leak.
>> >
>> > I saw the memory leak on a RBD system where a pool had just 8 PGs, but 
>> > after
>> > going to 1024 PGs in a new pool it seemed to be resolved.
>> >
>> > I've asked somebody else to try your patch since he's still seeing it on 
>> > his
>> > systems. Hopefully that gives us some results.
>>
>> The PGs were active+clean when you saw the leak?  There is a problem (that
>> we just fixed in master) where pg logs aren't trimmed for degraded PGs.
>>
>> sage
>>
>> >
>> > Wido
>> >
>> > > Can you try wip-osd-log-trim (which is bobtail + a simple patch) and see
>> > > if that seems to work?  Note that that patch shouldn't be run in a mixed
>> > > argonaut+bobtail cluster, since it isn't properly checking if the scrub 
>> > > is
>> > > class or chunky/deep.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > > sage
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >   > --
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > S?bastien Han.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Gregory Farnum <g...@inktank.com> 
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:57 AM, S?bastien Han 
>> > > > > <han.sebast...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > Is osd.1 using the heap profiler as well? Keep in mind that 
>> > > > > > > active
>> > > > > > > use
>> > > > > > > of the memory profiler will itself cause memory usage to 
>> > > > > > > increase ?
>> > > > > > > this sounds a bit like that to me since it's staying stable at a
>> > > > > > > large
>> > > > > > > but finite portion of total memory.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Well, the memory consumption was already high before the profiler 
>> > > > > > was
>> > > > > > started. So yes with the memory profiler enable an OSD might 
>> > > > > > consume
>> > > > > > more memory but this doesn't cause the memory leaks.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My concern is that maybe you saw a leak but when you restarted with
>> > > > > the memory profiling you lost whatever conditions caused it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Any ideas? Nothing to say about my scrumbing theory?
>> > > > > I like it, but Sam indicates that without some heap dumps which
>> > > > > capture the actual leak then scrub is too large to effectively code
>> > > > > review for leaks. :(
>> > > > > -Greg
>> > > > --
>> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" 
>> > > > in
>> > > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> > > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > --
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wido den Hollander
>> > 42on B.V.
>> >
>> > Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
>> > Skype: contact42on
>> >
>> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to