Replica count has been set to 2.

Why?
--
Regards,
Sébastien Han.


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Vladislav Gorbunov <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> FYI I'm using 450 pgs for my pools.
> Please, can you show the number of object replicas?
>
> ceph osd dump | grep 'rep size'
>
> Vlad Gorbunov
>
> 2013/3/5 Sébastien Han <han.sebast...@gmail.com>:
>> FYI I'm using 450 pgs for my pools.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Sébastien Han.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Sage Weil <s...@inktank.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>>> > On 02/23/2013 01:44 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
>>> > > > Hi all,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I finally got a core dump.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I did it with a kill -SEGV on the OSD process.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/ahv6hm0ipnak5rf/core-ceph-osd-11-0-0-20100-1361539008
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Hope we will get something out of it :-).
>>> > >
>>> > > AHA!  We have a theory.  The pg log isnt trimmed during scrub (because 
>>> > > teh
>>> > > old scrub code required that), but the new (deep) scrub can take a very
>>> > > long time, which means the pg log will eat ram in the meantime..
>>> > > especially under high iops.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Does the number of PGs influence the memory leak? So my theory is that 
>>> > when
>>> > you have a high number of PGs with a low number of objects per PG you 
>>> > don't
>>> > see the memory leak.
>>> >
>>> > I saw the memory leak on a RBD system where a pool had just 8 PGs, but 
>>> > after
>>> > going to 1024 PGs in a new pool it seemed to be resolved.
>>> >
>>> > I've asked somebody else to try your patch since he's still seeing it on 
>>> > his
>>> > systems. Hopefully that gives us some results.
>>>
>>> The PGs were active+clean when you saw the leak?  There is a problem (that
>>> we just fixed in master) where pg logs aren't trimmed for degraded PGs.
>>>
>>> sage
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Wido
>>> >
>>> > > Can you try wip-osd-log-trim (which is bobtail + a simple patch) and see
>>> > > if that seems to work?  Note that that patch shouldn't be run in a mixed
>>> > > argonaut+bobtail cluster, since it isn't properly checking if the scrub 
>>> > > is
>>> > > class or chunky/deep.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks!
>>> > > sage
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >   > --
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > S?bastien Han.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Gregory Farnum <g...@inktank.com> 
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:57 AM, S?bastien Han 
>>> > > > > <han.sebast...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > Is osd.1 using the heap profiler as well? Keep in mind that 
>>> > > > > > > active
>>> > > > > > > use
>>> > > > > > > of the memory profiler will itself cause memory usage to 
>>> > > > > > > increase ?
>>> > > > > > > this sounds a bit like that to me since it's staying stable at a
>>> > > > > > > large
>>> > > > > > > but finite portion of total memory.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Well, the memory consumption was already high before the profiler 
>>> > > > > > was
>>> > > > > > started. So yes with the memory profiler enable an OSD might 
>>> > > > > > consume
>>> > > > > > more memory but this doesn't cause the memory leaks.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > My concern is that maybe you saw a leak but when you restarted with
>>> > > > > the memory profiling you lost whatever conditions caused it.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Any ideas? Nothing to say about my scrumbing theory?
>>> > > > > I like it, but Sam indicates that without some heap dumps which
>>> > > > > capture the actual leak then scrub is too large to effectively code
>>> > > > > review for leaks. :(
>>> > > > > -Greg
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" 
>>> > > > in
>>> > > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>>> > > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>>> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Wido den Hollander
>>> > 42on B.V.
>>> >
>>> > Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
>>> > Skype: contact42on
>>> >
>>> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to