Hi Xinxin, On Wed, 28 May 2014, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > Hi sage , > I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and > --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will > compile the code that get from ceph repository , with --with-librocksdb > option , in case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile > the rocksdb code , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ? > > since current rocksdb does not support autoconf&automake , I will add > autoconf&automake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we > should fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .
That sounds right to me. We can update which commit we're building easily later. Thanks! sage > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Nelson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM > To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil > Cc: [email protected]; Zhang, Jian > Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support > > On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > > Hi, sage > > > > I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have > > fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. > > Then optimize on rocksdb performance. > > I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here. Last winter > I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw > leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb. I'm very interested in what you see with > rocksdb as a backend. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sage Weil [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM > > To: Shu, Xinxin > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support > > > > Hi Xinxin, > > > > I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that > > includes the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb > > patch. There is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule. I'm > > thinking that, since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this > > point, this is going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people. > > > > If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so > > that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com. I suspect > > that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared > > libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in > > the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and > > --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use > > the static or dynamically linked one. > > > > Has your group done further testing with rocksdb? Anything interesting to > > share? > > > > Thanks! > > sage > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" > > in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
