Hi Ceph,

The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch was tested with 
the rgw, rados and rbd suites. The results of each suite have been analyzed and 
summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501. The next steps are either:

a) Yehuda for rgw, Josh for rbd and Sam for rados all agree that the errors are 
unrelated to the backports
b) The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch is given to QE 
for final tests and merge into giant

OR

a) At least of the lead thinks more work is needed to stabilize the giant branch
b) A new set of tests will be run and analyzed after adding/removing one or 
more backports to/from the https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports 
branch

The description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501 shows a detailed list 
of all commits / issues that are in the giant backport branch. To get a global 
view of what the next giant point release will be, the description also 
includes the commits that have already been merged in the giant branch. The 
list of pull requests that are candidate for inclusion in the giant release but 
have not been included in the integration branch are also listed: maybe one of 
them could contribute to resolve a problem found during the tests. And finally 
all redmine issues that have been marked to be backported to giant but do not 
yet have a candidate pull request are listed: this is the backport backlog so 
to speak ;-)

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to