Hi Again, Well, this is a little embarassing but here it is : there won't be a point release for giant. I'll update the redmine tickets to remove the "giant" backport targets as well as the github milestone list accordingly.
Sorry for the noise. On 15/01/2015 17:12, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Ceph, > > The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch was tested with > the rgw, rados and rbd suites. The results of each suite have been analyzed > and summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501. The next steps are > either: > > a) Yehuda for rgw, Josh for rbd and Sam for rados all agree that the errors > are unrelated to the backports > b) The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch is given to > QE for final tests and merge into giant > > OR > > a) At least of the lead thinks more work is needed to stabilize the giant > branch > b) A new set of tests will be run and analyzed after adding/removing one or > more backports to/from the https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports > branch > > The description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501 shows a detailed list > of all commits / issues that are in the giant backport branch. To get a > global view of what the next giant point release will be, the description > also includes the commits that have already been merged in the giant branch. > The list of pull requests that are candidate for inclusion in the giant > release but have not been included in the integration branch are also listed: > maybe one of them could contribute to resolve a problem found during the > tests. And finally all redmine issues that have been marked to be backported > to giant but do not yet have a candidate pull request are listed: this is the > backport backlog so to speak ;-) > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
