Greg & Yuri : I stand corrected, I should have been less affirmative on a topic I know little about. Thanks !
On 21/07/2015 18:33, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic > > I don't use teuthology-kill simultaneously only sequentially. > As far as run time, just as a note, when we use 'stale' arg and it invokes > ipmitool interface it does take awhile to finish. > > > Thx > YuriW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org> > To: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:13:04 AM > Subject: timeout 120 teuthology-killl is highly recommended > > Hi Ceph, > > Today I did something wrong and that blocked the lab for a good half hour. > > a) I ran two teuthology-kill simultaneously and that makes them deadlock each > other > b) I let them run unattended only to come back to the terminal 30 minutes > later and see them stuck. > > Sure, two teuthology-kill simultaneously should not deadlock and that needs > to be fixed. But the easy workaround to avoid that trouble is to just not let > it run forever. Even for ~200 jobs it takes at most a minute or two. And if > it takes longer it probably means another teuthology-kill competes and it > should be interrupted and restarted later. From now on I'll do > > timeout 120 teuthology-kill .... || echo FAIL! > > as a generic safeguard. > > Apologies for the troubles. > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature