Am 28.05.2014 16:13, schrieb Wido den Hollander: > On 05/28/2014 04:11 PM, VELARTIS Philipp Dürhammer wrote: >> Is someone using btrfs in production? >> I know people say it’s still not stable. But do we use so many features >> with ceph? And facebook uses it also in production. Would be a big speed >> gain. > > As far as I know the main problem is still performance degradation over > time. On a SSD-only cluster this would be less of a problem since seek > times on SSDs aren't a really big problem, but on spinning disks they are. > > I haven't seen btrfs in production on any Ceph cluster I encountered.
It heavily fragements over time. Also no kernel backports are available to stable kernels. So which one would you choose? Stefan >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
