On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Christian Balzer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 20:24:00 -0400 J David wrote: > >> While adding some nodes to a ceph emperor cluster using ceph-deploy, >> the new nodes somehow wound up with 0.80.1, which I think is a Firefly >> release. >> > This was asked and solved in the "ceph-deploy with --release (--stable) > for dumpling?" thread earlier this week.
correct, if you don't specify what release you want/need, ceph-deploy will use the latest stable release (firefly as of this writing) > > I wouldn't want to run mixed cluster for a prolonged time, so if you don't > want to upgrade to firefly in general, pin it to emperor. > > Christian > >> The ceph version on existing nodes: >> >> $ ceph --version >> ceph version 0.72.2 (a913ded2ff138aefb8cb84d347d72164099cfd60) >> >> The repository on the new nodes: >> >> $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list >> deb http://ceph.com/debian-emperor/ trusty main >> >> The ceph version on new nodes: >> >> $ ceph --version >> ceph version 0.80.1 (a38fe1169b6d2ac98b427334c12d7cf81f809b74) >> >> Inspecting the repository on ceph.com, it does look like it contains >> 0.72.2 packages. >> >> How did we get 0.80.1 instead? Is this expected behavior? Will it >> cause problems for us? >> >> Thanks for any advice! >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > > -- > Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > [email protected] Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications > http://www.gol.com/ > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
