Hi, ok the write test also shows now a more expected behaviour.
As it seems to me, if there is more writing than osd_tier_promote_max_bytes_sec the write's are going directly against the cold pool ( which is a really good behaviour ( seriously ) ). But that should be definitly added to the documentation. Otherwise (new) people have no chance to find that. The search engines show < 10 hits for "osd_tier_promote_max_bytes_sec" one of it in http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2016-February/007632.html which has a totally different topic. Anyway, super super big thanks for your time ! -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards Oliver Dzombic IP-Interactive mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de Anschrift: IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 63571 Gelnhausen HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 UST ID: DE274086107 Am 14.06.2016 um 07:47 schrieb Nick Fisk: > osd_tier_promote_max_objects_sec > and > osd_tier_promote_max_bytes_sec > > is what you are looking for, I think by default its set to 5MB/s, which > would roughly correlate to why you are only seeing around 8 objects each > time being promoted. This was done like this as too many promotions hurt > performance, so you don't actually want to promote on every IO. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >> Christian Balzer >> Sent: 14 June 2016 02:00 >> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] strange cache tier behaviour with cephfs >> >> >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:52:43 +0200 Oliver Dzombic wrote: >> >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> if i read a 1,5 GB file, which is not changing at all. >>> >>> Then i expect the agent to copy it one time from the cold pool to the >>> cache pool. >>> >> Before Jewel, that is what you would have seen, yes. >> >> Did you read what Sam wrote and me in reply to him? >> >>> In fact its every time making a new copy. >>> >> Is it? >> Is there 1.5GB of data copied into the cache tier each time? >> An object is 4MB, you only had 8 in your first run, then 16... >> >>> I can see that by increasing disc usage of the cache and the >>> increasing object number. >>> >>> And the non existing improvement of speed. >>> >> That could be down to your network or other factors on your client. >> >> Christian >> -- >> Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer >> ch...@gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications >> http://www.gol.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
