BTW, why you need to iterate so much objects..... I think it should be done by other ways to achieve the goal.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 19:27, Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> wrote: >> In librados getting a stat is basically equivalent to reading a small >> object; there's not an index or anything so FileStore needs to descend its >> folder hierarchy. If looking at metadata for all the objects in the system >> efficiently is important you'll want to layer an index in somewhere. >> -Greg >> > > Yeah, that's not particularly good to hear. Is this slowness also > inherent in list_nobjects too? It looks like I can iterate all > objects at a rate no faster than 25K per second. No chance at > speeding this up either by having two or more instances starting at > different pg offsets. > > For this particular operation, it's only looking for orphaned objects. > This wouldn't be needed if a mechanism for TTLs existed and set on all > objects. But that would mean finding out how RGW gets away with it, > and I assume with another very large index and actively keeping track > of all set destruction times. > > -- > Iain Buclaw > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
