We use the 800GB version as journal devices with up to an 1:18 ratio and have 
had good experiences no bottleneck on the journal side. These also feature good 
endurance characteristics. I would think that higher capacities are hard to 
justify as journals

-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Heath 
Albritton
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Intel P3700 SSD for journals

I've used the 400GB unit extensively for almost 18 months, one per six drives.  
They've performed flawlessly.

In practice, journals will typically be quite small relative to the total 
capacity of the SSD.  As such, there will be plenty of room for wear leveling.  
If there was some concern, one could over-provision them even more than they 
already are.

-H

> On Nov 18, 2016, at 05:43, William Josefsson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi list, I wonder if there is anyone who have experience with Intel
> P3700 SSD drives as Journals, and can share their experience?
> 
> I was thinking of using the P3700 SSD 400GB as journal in my ceph 
> deployment. It is benchmarked in Sebastian hann ssd page as well.
> However a vendor I spoke to didn't qualify the small sizes of this 
> model as "enterprise grade/warranty". They suggested the 1.8TB or 2TB.
> I have asked for clarification on why this is the case.
> 
> Has anyone experienced any issues with the smaller size P3700 SSDs, 
> and I'm not sure how a smaller drive could affect the quality of the 
> product? Maybe anyone can shed light on if the size of the SSD drive 
> matters? thx will _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to