Thanks for the tip Robert, much appreciated. > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:rob...@leblancnet.us] > Sent: 23 November 2016 00:54 > To: Eugen Block <ebl...@nde.ag> > Cc: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] deep-scrubbing has large impact on performance > > If you use wpq, I recommend also setting "osd_op_queue_cut_off = high" > as well, otherwise replication OPs are not weighted and really reduces the > benefit of wpq. > ---------------- > Robert LeBlanc > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Eugen Block <ebl...@nde.ag> wrote: > > Thank you! > > > > > > Zitat von Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>: > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On > >>> Behalf Of Eugen Block > >>> Sent: 22 November 2016 10:11 > >>> To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> > >>> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] deep-scrubbing has large impact on > >>> performance > >>> > >>> Thanks for the very quick answer! > >>> > >>> > If you are using Jewel > >>> > >>> We are still using Hammer (0.94.7), we wanted to upgrade to Jewel in > >>> a couple of weeks, would you recommend to do it now? > >> > >> > >> It's been fairly solid for me, but you might want to wait for the > >> scrubbing hang bug to be fixed before upgrading. I think this might > >> be fixed in the upcoming 10.2.4 release. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Zitat von Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>: > >>> > >>> >> -----Original Message----- > >>> >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On > >>> >> Behalf Of Eugen Block > >>> >> Sent: 22 November 2016 09:55 > >>> >> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> >> Subject: [ceph-users] deep-scrubbing has large impact on > >>> >> performance > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi list, > >>> >> > >>> >> I've been searching the mail archive and the web for some help. I > >>> >> tried the things I found, but I can't see the effects. We use > >>> > Ceph for > >>> >> our Openstack environment. > >>> >> > >>> >> When our cluster (2 pools, each 4092 PGs, in 20 OSDs on 4 nodes, > >>> >> 3 > >>> >> MONs) starts deep-scrubbing, it's impossible to work with the VMs. > >>> >> Currently, the deep-scrubs happen to start on Monday, which is > >>> >> unfortunate. I already plan to start the next deep-scrub on > >>> > Saturday, > >>> >> so it has no impact on our work days. But if I imagine we had a > >>> >> large multi-datacenter, such performance breaks are not > >>> > reasonable. So > >>> >> I'm wondering how do you guys manage that? > >>> >> > >>> >> What I've tried so far: > >>> >> > >>> >> ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_scrub_sleep 0.1' > >>> >> ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_disk_thread_ioprio_priority 7' > >>> >> ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_disk_thread_ioprio_class idle' > >>> >> ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_scrub_begin_hour 0' > >>> >> ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_scrub_end_hour 7' > >>> >> > >>> >> And I also added these options to the ceph.conf. > >>> >> To be able to work again, I had to set the nodeep-scrub option > >>> >> and unset it when I left the office. Today, I see the cluster > >>> >> deep- scrubbing again, but only one PG at a time, it seems that > >>> >> now the default for osd_max_scrubs is working now and I don't see > >>> >> major impacts yet. > >>> >> > >>> >> But is there something else I can do to reduce the performance impact? > >>> > > >>> > If you are using Jewel, the scrubing is now done in the client IO > >>> > thread, so those disk thread options won't do anything. Instead > >>> > there is a new priority setting, which seems to work for me, along > >>> > with a few other settings. > >>> > > >>> > osd_scrub_priority = 1 > >>> > osd_scrub_sleep = .1 > >>> > osd_scrub_chunk_min = 1 > >>> > osd_scrub_chunk_max = 5 > >>> > osd_scrub_load_threshold = 5 > >>> > > >>> > Also enabling the weighted priority queue can assist the new > >>> > priority options > >>> > > >>> > osd_op_queue = wpq > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> I just found [1] and will have a look into it. > >>> >> > >>> >> [1] http://prob6.com/en/ceph-pg-deep-scrub-cron/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks! > >>> >> Eugen > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Eugen Block voice : +49-40-559 51 75 > >>> >> NDE Netzdesign und -entwicklung AG fax : +49-40-559 51 77 > >>> >> Postfach 61 03 15 > >>> >> D-22423 Hamburg e-mail : ebl...@nde.ag > >>> >> > >>> >> Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrates: Angelika Mozdzen > >>> >> Sitz und Registergericht: Hamburg, HRB 90934 > >>> >> Vorstand: Jens-U. Mozdzen > >>> >> USt-IdNr. DE 814 013 983 > >>> >> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>> >> ceph-users mailing list > >>> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Eugen Block voice : +49-40-559 51 75 > >>> NDE Netzdesign und -entwicklung AG fax : +49-40-559 51 77 > >>> Postfach 61 03 15 > >>> D-22423 Hamburg e-mail : ebl...@nde.ag > >>> > >>> Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrates: Angelika Mozdzen > >>> Sitz und Registergericht: Hamburg, HRB 90934 > >>> Vorstand: Jens-U. Mozdzen > >>> USt-IdNr. DE 814 013 983 > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> ceph-users mailing list > >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eugen Block voice : +49-40-559 51 75 > > NDE Netzdesign und -entwicklung AG fax : +49-40-559 51 77 > > Postfach 61 03 15 > > D-22423 Hamburg e-mail : ebl...@nde.ag > > > > Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrates: Angelika Mozdzen > > Sitz und Registergericht: Hamburg, HRB 90934 > > Vorstand: Jens-U. Mozdzen > > USt-IdNr. DE 814 013 983 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
