> From: "Sage Weil" <s...@newdream.net>
> To: "Alfredo Deza" <ad...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "ceph-devel" <ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org>, ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:09:29 AM
> Subject: [ceph-users] killing ceph-disk [was Re: ceph-volume: migration and 
> disk partition support]
> 
> To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
> 

 
> Perhaps the "out" here is to support a "dir" option where the user
> can
> manually provision and mount an OSD on /var/lib/ceph/osd/*, with
> 'journal'
> or 'block' symlinks, and ceph-volume will do the last bits that
> initialize
> the filestore or bluestore OSD from there.  Then if someone has a
> scenario
> that isn't captured by LVM (or whatever else we support) they can
> always
> do it manually?
> 


In fact, now that bluestore only requires a few small files and symlinks to 
remain in /var/lib/ceph/osd/* without the extra requirements for xattrs support 
and xfs, why not simply leave those folders on OS root filesystem and only 
point symlinks to bluestore block and db devices? That would simplify the osd 
deployment so much - and the symlinks can then point to /dev/disk/by-uuid or 
by-path or lvm path or whatever. The only downside for this approach that I see 
is that disks themselves would no longer be transferable between the hosts as 
those few files that describe the OSD are no longer on the disk itself.

Regards,
Anthony

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to