I guess my questions are more centered around k+m and PG calculations.

As we were starting to build and test our EC pools with our infrastructure we 
were trying to figure out what our calculations needed to be starting with 3 
OSD hosts with 12 x 10 TB OSDs a piece.  The nodes have the ability to expand 
to 24 drives a piece and we hope to eventually get to around a 1PB cluster 
after we add some more hosts.  Initially we hoped to be able to do a k=10 m=2 
on the pool but I am not sure that is going to be feasible.  We’d like to set 
up the failure domain so that we would be able to lose an entire host without 
losing the cluster.  At this point I’m not sure that’s possible without 
bringing in more hosts.

Thanks for the help!

Tim Gipson


On 11/12/17, 5:14 PM, "Christian Wuerdig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    I might be wrong, but from memory I think you can use
    http://ceph.com/pgcalc/ and use k+m for the size
    
    On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Ashley Merrick <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > Are you having any issues with getting the pool working or just around the
    > PG num you should use?
    >
    > ,Ashley
    >
    > Get Outlook for Android
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: ceph-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Tim 
Gipson
    > <[email protected]>
    > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 5:38:02 AM
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: [ceph-users] Erasure Coding Pools and PG calculation -
    > documentation
    >
    > Hey all,
    >
    > I’m having some trouble setting up a Pool for Erasure Coding.  I haven’t
    > found much documentation around the PG calculation for an Erasure Coding
    > pool.  It seems from what I’ve tried so far that the math needed to set 
one
    > up is different than the math you use to calculate PGs for a regular
    > replicated pool.
    >
    > Does anyone have any experience setting up a pool this way and can you 
give
    > me some help or direction, or point me toward some documentation that goes
    > over the math behind this sort of pool setup?
    >
    > Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    >
    > Tim Gipson
    > Systems Engineer
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > ceph-users mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > ceph-users mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
    >
    

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to