Thanks for the reply - unfortunatly the link you send is behind a paywall so at least for now i can’t read it.
output of ceph osd dump shows that pgp num == pg num:
[root@ctrl01 ~]# ceph osd dump
epoch 142
fsid 0e2d841f-68fd-4629-9813-ab083e8c0f10
created 2017-12-20 23:04:59.781525
modified 2018-01-14 21:30:57.528682
flags sortbitwise,recovery_deletes,purged_snapdirs
crush_version 6
full_ratio 0.95
backfillfull_ratio 0.9
nearfull_ratio 0.85
require_min_compat_client jewel
min_compat_client jewel
require_osd_release luminous
pool 1 'glance' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash rjenkins
pg_num 64 pgp_num 64 last_change 119 flags hashpspool stripe_width 0
application rbd
removed_snaps [1~3]
pool 2 'cinder-2' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash
rjenkins pg_num 64 pgp_num 64 last_change 120 flags hashpspool stripe_width 0
application rbd
removed_snaps [1~3]
pool 3 'cinder-3' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash
rjenkins pg_num 64 pgp_num 64 last_change 121 flags hashpspool stripe_width 0
application rbd
removed_snaps [1~3]
pool 4 '.rgw.root' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash
rjenkins pg_num 8 pgp_num 8 last_change 94 owner 18446744073709551615 flags
hashpspool stripe_width 0 application rgw
max_osd 3
osd.0 up in weight 1 up_from 82 up_thru 140 down_at 79 last_clean_interval
[23,78) 10.16.0.11:6800/1795 10.16.0.11:6801/1795 10.16.0.11:6802/1795
10.16.0.11:6803/1795 exists,up abe33844-6d98-4ede-81a8-a8bdc92dada8
osd.1 up in weight 1 up_from 73 up_thru 140 down_at 71 last_clean_interval
[55,72) 10.16.0.13:6800/1756 10.16.0.13:6804/1001756 10.16.0.13:6805/1001756
10.16.0.13:6806/1001756 exists,up 0dab9372-6ffe-4a23-a8b7-4edca3745a2a
osd.2 up in weight 1 up_from 140 up_thru 140 down_at 133 last_clean_interval
[31,132) 10.16.0.12:6800/1749 10.16.0.12:6801/1749 10.16.0.12:6802/1749
10.16.0.12:6803/1749 exists,up 220bba17-8119-4035-9e43-5b8eaa27562f
> Am 15.01.2018 um 01:33 schrieb Brad Hubbard <[email protected]>:
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Alexander Peters
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I am currently experiencing a strange issue with my radosgw. It Fails to
>> start and all tit says is:
>> [root@ctrl02 ~]# /usr/bin/radosgw --cluster ceph --name
>> client.radosgw.ctrl02 --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph -f -d
>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.132007 7f44ddd18e00 0 deferred set uid:gid to 167:167
>> (ceph:ceph)
>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.132161 7f44ddd18e00 0 ceph version 12.2.2
>> (cf0baeeeeba3b47f9427c6c97e2144b094b7e5ba) luminous (stable), process
>> (unknown), pid 13928
>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.556672 7f44ddd18e00 -1 ERROR: failed to initialize
>> watch: (34) Numerical result out of range
>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.558752 7f44ddd18e00 -1 Couldn't init storage provider
>> (RADOS)
>>
>> (when started via systemctl it writes the same lines to the logfile)
>>
>> strange thing is that it is working on an other env that was installed with
>> the same set of ansible playbooks.
>> OS is CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core)
>>
>> Ceph is up and running ( I am currently using it for storing volumes and
>> images form Openstack )
>>
>> Does anyone have an idea how to debug this?
>
> According to https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2778161
> <https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2778161> this can
> happen if your pgp num is higher than the pg num.
>
> Check "ceph osd dump" output for that possibility.
>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Alexander
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
