On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Brad Hubbard <bhubb...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:20 AM, Nikos Kormpakis <nk...@noc.grnet.gr> wrote: >> On 01/16/2018 12:53 AM, Brad Hubbard wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Alexander Peters <apet...@sphinx.at> wrote: >>>> i created the dump output but it looks very cryptic to me so i can't >>>> really make much sense of it. is there anything to look for in particular? >>> >>> Yes, basically we are looking for any line that ends in "= 34". You >>> might also find piping it through c++filt helps. >>> >>> Something like... >>> >>> $ c++filt </tmp/ltrace.out|grep "= 34" >> >> Hello, >> we're facing the exact same issue. I added some more info about >> our cluster and output from ltrace in [1]. > > Unfortunately, the strlen lines in that output are expected. > > Is it possible for me to access the ltrace output file somehow > (you could email it directly or use ceph-post-file perhaps)?
Ah, nm, my bad. It turns out what we need is the hexadecimal int representation of '-34'. $ c++filt </tmp/ltrace.out|grep "0xffffffde" I'll update the tracker accordingly. > >> >> Best regards, >> Nikos. >> >> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22351 >> >>>> >>>> i think i am going to read up on how interpret ltrace output... >>>> >>>> BR >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>> Von: "Brad Hubbard" <bhubb...@redhat.com> >>>> An: "Alexander Peters" <alexander.pet...@sphinx.at> >>>> CC: "Ceph Users" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> >>>> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Januar 2018 03:09:53 >>>> Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw fails with "ERROR: failed to initialize >>>> watch: (34) Numerical result out of range" >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Brad Hubbard <bhubb...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Alexander Peters >>>>> <alexander.pet...@sphinx.at> wrote: >>>>>> Thanks for the reply - unfortunatly the link you send is behind a >>>>>> paywall so >>>>>> at least for now i can’t read it. >>>>> >>>>> That's why I provided the cause as laid out in that article (pgp num > pg >>>>> num). >>>>> >>>>> Do you have any settings in ceph.conf related to pg_num or pgp_num? >>>>> >>>>> If not, please add your details to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22351 >>>> >>>> Rados can return ERANGE (34) in multiple places so identifying where >>>> might be a big step towards working this out. >>>> >>>> $ ltrace -fo /tmp/ltrace.out /usr/bin/radosgw --cluster ceph --name >>>> client.radosgw.ctrl02 --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph -f -d >>>> >>>> The objective is to find which function(s) return 34. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> output of ceph osd dump shows that pgp num == pg num: >>>>>> >>>>>> [root@ctrl01 ~]# ceph osd dump >>>>>> epoch 142 >>>>>> fsid 0e2d841f-68fd-4629-9813-ab083e8c0f10 >>>>>> created 2017-12-20 23:04:59.781525 >>>>>> modified 2018-01-14 21:30:57.528682 >>>>>> flags sortbitwise,recovery_deletes,purged_snapdirs >>>>>> crush_version 6 >>>>>> full_ratio 0.95 >>>>>> backfillfull_ratio 0.9 >>>>>> nearfull_ratio 0.85 >>>>>> require_min_compat_client jewel >>>>>> min_compat_client jewel >>>>>> require_osd_release luminous >>>>>> pool 1 'glance' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash >>>>>> rjenkins pg_num 64 pgp_num 64 last_change 119 flags hashpspool >>>>>> stripe_width >>>>>> 0 application rbd >>>>>> removed_snaps [1~3] >>>>>> pool 2 'cinder-2' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash >>>>>> rjenkins pg_num 64 pgp_num 64 last_change 120 flags hashpspool >>>>>> stripe_width >>>>>> 0 application rbd >>>>>> removed_snaps [1~3] >>>>>> pool 3 'cinder-3' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash >>>>>> rjenkins pg_num 64 pgp_num 64 last_change 121 flags hashpspool >>>>>> stripe_width >>>>>> 0 application rbd >>>>>> removed_snaps [1~3] >>>>>> pool 4 '.rgw.root' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash >>>>>> rjenkins pg_num 8 pgp_num 8 last_change 94 owner 18446744073709551615 >>>>>> flags >>>>>> hashpspool stripe_width 0 application rgw >>>>>> max_osd 3 >>>>>> osd.0 up in weight 1 up_from 82 up_thru 140 down_at 79 >>>>>> last_clean_interval [23,78) 10.16.0.11:6800/1795 10.16.0.11:6801/1795 >>>>>> 10.16.0.11:6802/1795 10.16.0.11:6803/1795 exists,up >>>>>> abe33844-6d98-4ede-81a8-a8bdc92dada8 >>>>>> osd.1 up in weight 1 up_from 73 up_thru 140 down_at 71 >>>>>> last_clean_interval [55,72) 10.16.0.13:6800/1756 10.16.0.13:6804/1001756 >>>>>> 10.16.0.13:6805/1001756 10.16.0.13:6806/1001756 exists,up >>>>>> 0dab9372-6ffe-4a23-a8b7-4edca3745a2a >>>>>> osd.2 up in weight 1 up_from 140 up_thru 140 down_at 133 >>>>>> last_clean_interval [31,132) 10.16.0.12:6800/1749 10.16.0.12:6801/1749 >>>>>> 10.16.0.12:6802/1749 10.16.0.12:6803/1749 exists,up >>>>>> 220bba17-8119-4035-9e43-5b8eaa27562f >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 15.01.2018 um 01:33 schrieb Brad Hubbard <bhubb...@redhat.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Alexander Peters >>>>>> <alexander.pet...@sphinx.at> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello >>>>>> >>>>>> I am currently experiencing a strange issue with my radosgw. It Fails to >>>>>> start and all tit says is: >>>>>> [root@ctrl02 ~]# /usr/bin/radosgw --cluster ceph --name >>>>>> client.radosgw.ctrl02 --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph -f -d >>>>>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.132007 7f44ddd18e00 0 deferred set uid:gid to >>>>>> 167:167 >>>>>> (ceph:ceph) >>>>>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.132161 7f44ddd18e00 0 ceph version 12.2.2 >>>>>> (cf0baeeeeba3b47f9427c6c97e2144b094b7e5ba) luminous (stable), process >>>>>> (unknown), pid 13928 >>>>>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.556672 7f44ddd18e00 -1 ERROR: failed to initialize >>>>>> watch: (34) Numerical result out of range >>>>>> 2018-01-14 21:30:57.558752 7f44ddd18e00 -1 Couldn't init storage provider >>>>>> (RADOS) >>>>>> >>>>>> (when started via systemctl it writes the same lines to the logfile) >>>>>> >>>>>> strange thing is that it is working on an other env that was installed >>>>>> with >>>>>> the same set of ansible playbooks. >>>>>> OS is CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) >>>>>> >>>>>> Ceph is up and running ( I am currently using it for storing volumes and >>>>>> images form Openstack ) >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone have an idea how to debug this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> According to https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2778161 this can >>>>>> happen if your pgp num is higher than the pg num. >>>>>> >>>>>> Check "ceph osd dump" output for that possibility. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>> Alexander >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Brad >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Brad >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Brad >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Nikos Kormpakis - nk...@noc.grnet.gr >> Network Operations Center, Greek Research & Technology Network >> Tel: +30 210 7475712 - http://www.grnet.gr >> 7, Kifisias Av., 115 23 Athens, Greece >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > -- > Cheers, > Brad -- Cheers, Brad _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
