On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > the following updates / changes for IPv6 have been commited to OpenWrt in > the last days. Most of these affect RFC 6204 CE-compliance, some are > convenience changes. > > Feel free to merge and test CeroWrt.
I have merged with openwrt head, and updated to dnsmasq 2.66test4, and also folded in the tiny luci upnp fix to the '&' issue. I'm not really sure if that last is the right thing, it's supposed to be translated... http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.6.11-4/ I am still not in a position to test anything cerowrt related myself right now, although I am down to a mere 20 miles between me and the yurtlab and 50 from isc. I am relieved to hear that amazon claims they will get new supplies of the wndr3800 by jan 5. I am staring at the bunch of hardware I ordered in something of a panic - dreamplug, wndr4300, the nanostations, a couple bus pirates, a nexus 7, and trying to figure out a direction to move forward that makes sense. > * Detect and delegate IPv6-specific MTU from upstream interfaces (e.g. > tunnels, pppoe, etc.) and propagate them to downstream interfaces > (supporting cases where IPv4-MTU and IPv6-MTU differ, e.g. 6in4, 6rd, 6to4, > ...) Excellent! PPPoE? > * Add a default null-route for delegated prefixes (CE-requirement WPD-6) > This fixes routing loops in case packets with a destination within an unused > / unassigned part of a delegated prefix are received. > > * Added support for site-borders (interfaces which ULA-traffic might not > cross) as specified in CE-requirement ULA-4 > > * Added support to override CE-requirement ULA-5 for NPT-setups (iirc not > relevant if dnsmasq is used, as it does not follow ULA-5). > > > Documentation on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 has been updated. > > > > Btw. Simon Kelley released 2.66-test4 which fixes some bugs related to > stateful DHCPv6 and should make it usable finally. Also the new > MTU-propagation mentioned above is now supported by dnsmasq as well. > I haven't tested it myself yet but you can try if you are brave. I folded in the same patches as were used in 2.66-test3. A good default configuration for cero would be good, Not sure what that is... > > I will try to make a table about the RFC requirements for Customer Edge > (CE)-Routers soon which sums up which requirements are fulfilled and which > are still not implemented both for CeroWrt / OpenWrt with 6relayd and with > dnsmasq as RA/DHCPv6-server. > > > Cheers, > > Steven > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
