On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <[email protected]> wrote: > Upnp works fine. > Ssdpd doesn't, not sure why, it's late now. will test tomorrow. > > p.s. /use/shin/simple_qos fails on non-existant /etc/functions.sh > Am I doing something wrong?
No. Probably that changed. You can comment that out. I see also that nfq_codel on the nano-m build failed to link right. Might just be a bug on that build. insmod sch_nfq_codel on cero. > > Maciej > > On 28 Dec 2012 21:19, "Dave Taht" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > the following updates / changes for IPv6 have been commited to OpenWrt >> > in >> > the last days. Most of these affect RFC 6204 CE-compliance, some are >> > convenience changes. >> > >> > Feel free to merge and test CeroWrt. >> >> I have merged with openwrt head, and updated to dnsmasq 2.66test4, and >> also folded in the tiny luci upnp fix to the '&' issue. I'm not really >> sure if that last is the right thing, it's supposed to be >> translated... >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.6.11-4/ >> >> I am still not in a position to test anything cerowrt related myself >> right now, although I am down to a mere 20 miles between me and the >> yurtlab and 50 from isc. >> >> I am relieved to hear that amazon claims they will get new supplies of >> the wndr3800 by jan 5. >> >> I am staring at the bunch of hardware I ordered in something of a >> panic - dreamplug, wndr4300, the nanostations, a couple bus pirates, a >> nexus 7, and trying to figure out a direction to move forward that >> makes sense. >> >> > * Detect and delegate IPv6-specific MTU from upstream interfaces (e.g. >> > tunnels, pppoe, etc.) and propagate them to downstream interfaces >> > (supporting cases where IPv4-MTU and IPv6-MTU differ, e.g. 6in4, 6rd, >> > 6to4, >> > ...) >> >> Excellent! PPPoE? >> >> > * Add a default null-route for delegated prefixes (CE-requirement WPD-6) >> > This fixes routing loops in case packets with a destination within an >> > unused >> > / unassigned part of a delegated prefix are received. >> > >> > * Added support for site-borders (interfaces which ULA-traffic might not >> > cross) as specified in CE-requirement ULA-4 >> > >> > * Added support to override CE-requirement ULA-5 for NPT-setups (iirc >> > not >> > relevant if dnsmasq is used, as it does not follow ULA-5). >> > >> > >> > Documentation on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 has been >> > updated. >> > >> > >> > >> > Btw. Simon Kelley released 2.66-test4 which fixes some bugs related to >> > stateful DHCPv6 and should make it usable finally. Also the new >> > MTU-propagation mentioned above is now supported by dnsmasq as well. >> > I haven't tested it myself yet but you can try if you are brave. >> >> I folded in the same patches as were used in 2.66-test3. >> >> A good default configuration for cero would be good, Not sure what that >> is... >> >> > >> > I will try to make a table about the RFC requirements for Customer Edge >> > (CE)-Routers soon which sums up which requirements are fulfilled and >> > which >> > are still not implemented both for CeroWrt / OpenWrt with 6relayd and >> > with >> > dnsmasq as RA/DHCPv6-server. >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Steven >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
