On 8.5.2013, at 13.22, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > That's underlying problem with both dnsmasq and odhcp6c forked changes - we > use IOS-specific prefix class option # that is NOT from IANA, and I'd rather > not see it in wide use for obvious reasons. > > I have few problems with IOS setting a default standard, open source > following it, and the IANA blessing it later. :) That said, what is the > status of the IANA application? Link?
IANA application is applicable iff draft is about to go RFC; I'm not related to that author in any shape or form, so no clue (not even sure if draft is going anywhere, in IETF86 there was muted response at best to it if I remember right). Cheers, -Markus _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
