On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Markus Stenberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> IANA application is applicable iff draft is about to go RFC; I'm not > related to that author in any shape or form, so no clue (not even sure if > draft is going anywhere, in IETF86 there was muted response at best to it > if I remember right). > What about the non-prefix colouring work, like source-based routing, prefix allocation, basic DHCPv6 fixes, etc.? Could that be merged upstream? For the prefix-colouring work, you could always commit the code using a vendor option and then update it when/if the draft gets traction?
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
