Reverted DNSmasq to 2.67test10* as suggested. Still no ipv4 addresses. Reverted 
to 3.10.11-3 again. Checked settings. Renewed leases. Rebooted everything.


On 11 Oct 2013, at 15:30, Dave Taht wrote:

> 
> On Oct 11, 2013 4:02 AM, "David Personette" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, it's still behaving the same for me. Failed back to 3.10.11-3 once 
> > more.
> 
> OK I will set aside time Sunday and Monday to poke deeply into this.
> 
> I note you probably needent revert all the way back to this version. You can 
> wget the version of DNSmasq from this versions packages and forcibly apply it 
> on top of 3.10.15-4 using opkg.
> 
> > --
> > David P.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> 3.10.15-4 is now out there, containing sufficient patches to get
> >> dnsmasq to the current head of tree, and including the patch below.
> >>
> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.15-4/
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Simon Kelley <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Having thought about this more, this patch is necessary
> >> >
> >> > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=8584c502d37627d8abe18213771b5f4f98cb4aa3
> >> >
> >> > and should fix the bug iff
> >> >
> >> > 1) Dnsmasq is configured using --except-interface=<upstream interface> 
> >> > and
> >> > there are no --interface=<interface we want to provide service on> config
> >> > lines.
> >> >
> >> > 2) Exactly one interface that dnsmasq should be listening on is around 
> >> > when
> >> > it starts, but others arrive later.
> >> >
> >> > I can't explain why it just broke though, this bug has been around 
> >> > forever.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Simon.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 10/10/13 19:30, Dave Taht wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Simon Kelley<[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Does reverting
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=397542b213ab4071734f1cdf4cc914d87100456f
> >> >>>
> >> >>> fix the issue? I fear it might.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Seems likely.
> >> >>
> >> >> I reverted that patch and put it in this build
> >> >>
> >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.15-3/
> >> >>
> >> >> I won't be in a position to test stuff myself til sunday but cero's
> >> >> devoted userbase seems to be hoovering over the reload button and will
> >> >> probably beat me to it....
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Simon.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 10/10/13 15:43, Dave Taht wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Dear Dr. Dnsmasq:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> When cerowrt made the jump between dnsmasq-2.67-test10 and
> >> >>>> dnsmasq-2.67-test17, detection of interfaces other than the first
> >> >>>> started failing. It seems to be related to interfaces that come up
> >> >>>> after dnsmasq starts, as restarting it after the device is fully
> >> >>>> booted works. Have moved forward to 2.67-rc3 to no avail.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> (along the way we migrated from kernel 3.10.11 to 3.10.13 to 3.10.15
> >> >>>> but I doubt that's the issue)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Hot, fresh, firmware can be had at:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> <knacky>   [10:39:25] has anyone had IPv4 DHCP problems in the last 
> >> >>>> two
> >> >>>> 3.10.x
> >> >>>> builds?  currently running 3.10.11-3 and it works flawlessly.
> >> >>>> upgraded to 3.10.13-2 and 3.10.15-1 and both present me with an
> >> >>>> identical issue.  upon reboot after upgrading, DHCP leases are no
> >> >>>> longer handed out on the wireless interfaces.  disabling and
> >> >>>> re-enabling DHCP on the wireless interfaces will fix the problem, but
> >> >>>> the problem
> >> >>>> <knacky>   [10:39:26] returns after a reboot.  disable/reenable DHCP 
> >> >>>> on
> >> >>>> the
> >> >>>> interface will again temporarily fix it.
> >> >>>> <knacky>   [10:42:03] also tried a fresh install (using reset to
> >> >>>> defaults
> >> >>>> option) to avoid anything not properly interpreted from the config of
> >> >>>> the previous version, but still get the same issue.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:30 AM, David Personette<[email protected]>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Just tested again with 3.10.15-2. My OSX (10.8.5) laptop worked,
> >> >>>>> neither
> >> >>>>> my
> >> >>>>> Nexus 7 (2013 w/CM10.2) or my Fedora 19 laptop could resolve DNS over
> >> >>>>> wireless. My wired Linux server (Ubuntu 12.04.3) was working fine as
> >> >>>>> well.
> >> >>>>> Reverted to 3.10.11-3 once more.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> David P.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:40 PM, David Personette<[email protected]>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I can confirm it as well. I wiped my config back to defaults, and it
> >> >>>>>> wasn't fixed. Reinstalled the 3.10.11-3 build, and restored my 
> >> >>>>>> configs
> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>> all is well.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> David P.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Fred Stratton<[email protected]>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> True for the last two builds. Wired works as expected.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Is this a problem with the development version of DNSMasq? What is
> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>> recommended workaround?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >> >>>>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> >>>>> [email protected]
> >> >>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Täht
> >>
> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: 
> >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Reply via email to