On 11/10/13 18:52, Richard E. Brown wrote:
Simon,

I'll try and learn how to flash the router Dave gave me so I can test this 
stuff myself.

For anyone interested in trying to do this at home, Dave wrote a *very* good 
procedure for flashing the ...xxx-squashfs-factory.img firmware via tftp at:

http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/CeroWrt_flashing_instructions

As noted on that page, the tftp process always works. You'll also need:

- bent paper clip
- Ethernet cable
- tftp client on your computer
- and of course, a WNDR3700v2 or WNDR3800 router

It takes longer to read the steps than to flash the firmware. :-)

Rich Brown
Hanover, NH USA


Indeed. Being located in a nautical, rather than office, environment I used a split-pin instead of a paperclip. I also had to find the firmware for the ethernet port in the ship's computer, which is not supported out-of-the-box by Ubuntu :-( That done, it went fine.

Poking around my newly flashed router, I find.

1) The dnsmasq config does indeed use --except-interface and no --interface statements, so the SO_BINDTODEVICE bug a talked about before may have caused the problem if exactly one interface is up when dnsmasq starts. The code I committed yesterday which logs setting SO_BINDTODEVICE is the final arbiter of this, but I think that bug should be fixed anyway. It may have been the original source of the problem.

2) This is an out-of-the-box router, I've not changed the config at all. I can see a single --dhcp-range, 172.30.42.2,172.30.42.27,255.255.255.224,24h which corresponds to the wired interface. I can't see anything for the wireless interfaces. When I go to the GUI for the wireless interface, I see it has address 172.30.42.65/26 and the DHCP service is enabled, but for start address 2 and 26 leases. Since 2 isn't in the 64-96 range, could that be the problem, or am I missing something obvious?

Cheers,

Simon.



_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Reply via email to