Aaron Wood <[email protected]> writes: > That would scale well for CeroWRT, but doesn't seem like it would > scale well for general-use (OpenWRT). Or rather, the use of > bufferbloat.net wouldn't scale well. But OpenWRT might be able to do > the same with it's key, and have it's own ntp.openwrt.org which > resolves into the general ntp pool.
Would this "caching of the key" be akin to distributing an extra trust anchor with the key of the domain in question? And would the gain of doing this be sufficient to warrant the extra complexity (as opposed to just caching the IP address of one or more NTP servers)? -Toke
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
