On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Richard A. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/02/2014 07:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >>> I beleive that on the WNDR3800, it's able to work up to about 50Mb with >>> the >>> existing configurations. A faster CPU would do better, a slower one >>> worse. >> >> >> Actually it appears that cache is very important on fixing inbound rate >> shaping. >> >> The octeon in the edgerouter lite peaks out at above 60mbits also, but the >> bigger, fatter pro product actually manages quite a bit better (with >> increasing >> inaccuracy however). See below... > > > Ugh. Got any hard numbers on the top speed of the edgerouter with shaping? > > At work we recently upgraded our link from 60/10 to 100/15 and the WNDR I > have running the show can no longer keep up. I've been looking for a > replacement and the edgerouter lite was looking like a possibility.
Shaping the uplink only still helps a lot. > I tried to use a TPLink AC1750 thinking that a newer setup with a faster cpu > might be able to keep up. If I don't have shaping enabled it can do 200+ > Mbit but with shaping it drops considerably. It's still faster than the > WNDR but seems to max out at about 85 Mbit. The fastest-looking thing I've played with of late is the netgear x4. It's dynamic QoS feature is basically fq_codel, near as I can tell. I'll try pushing it to 120Mbit this week. I do not have a high impression of it's overall firmware quality, and haven't seen the gpl drop yet. Aside from that, there's always x86. > -- > Richard A. Smith <[email protected]> > Former One Laptop per Child -- Dave Täht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
