Thank you all for cake... One of my recent pains had been that Comcast doubled my download speed to 100mbps, and CeroWrt using fq_codel/htb couldn't hack anywhere near that speed.
Now I have things set using cake, and can do much better, and have my cake and eat it too. http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/749786 - Jim On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2015, at 21:48 , Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It turns out that I am pulling from openwrt for luci-app-sqm, not > > ceropackages, and overriding it was a headache. Fixed now, see below > > > > router# cd /tmp; wget > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk ; > > opkg install ./luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk > > router # /etc/init.d/uhttpd restart > > > > if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces, but it worked for me, and > > yea! cake in the gui! thx sebastian! > > Too cite Shaggy “Wasn’t me” ;); the initial commit was not mine > and I do not want to claim otherwise. I basically just rearranged the > "deck-chairs" as I tend to think. I seem to be better at the “ love for > details” thing than the”big picture”, anyways > Best Regards > Sebastian > > > > > > > I tried - > > > > ./scripts feeds uninstall luci-app-sqm; ./scripts feeds install -p > > cero luci-app-sqm # seemed sane, did not work > > git rm in the feed itself did not work > > doing the uninstall, deleting the symlink, and the git rm, nuking the > > bin/ar71xx/packages/packages/luci-app-sqm* > > and doing a complete rebuild... eventually did work... but strikes me > > as a bit more brute force than I wanted. > > > > I am not in a position (aformentioned build is my specialized for > > pico/nano build at the moment) to update the packages db, > > but I stuck up the correct new package... which you can install via > > > > > > Apologies for the confusion, I simply figured that the -p option would > > work, and never checked. > > > > I also note that I think I am building things compile tuned for the > > archer mips34c, rather thanthe wndr3800´s 24c. However I kept the > > unaligned access hacks (not needed on the 34c derived archer, but > > needed on the 24c wndr3800) > > > > Sigh. > > > > maintaining 3 separate trees for the platforms we sort of support is a > > PITA. Then adding in something that can mesh by default on 2 others. > > and then trying to get anything to compile for another arch entirely > > and failing... > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> Hi Jim, > >> > >> > >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 19:21 , Jim Gettys <j...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Inquiring minds would like to know…. > >> > >> I guess, that depends on your definition of “LUCI GUI for cake”; > as far as I know you can select cake in the “Queueing Discipline” drop down > in the “Queue Discipline” tab of luci-app-sqm. So if the machine has the > cake module and a sufficiently recent (out-of-tree) tc binary installed it > should just work. Using the “Advanced option strings…” it even should be > possible to pass arbitrary strings to cake (without any error checking), so > I assume we are all set up for cake testing (or should that be cake > tasting?) from the LUCI GUI. But I have not managed to build cake locally, > nor have I dared to risk my families internet connectivity by trying one of > Dave’s newer "openwrt trunk with cake” builds. So these changes linger in > the ceropackages-3.10 repository until we get enough tasting to convince > Toke to pull them into the openwrt repositories (these changes affect both > sqm-scripts and luci-app-sqm). Dave graciously allowed me access to one of > his test machines, and the changes allow to set up cake from the GUI, but I > only did limited functionality testing. (And we discovered that something > was of in that cake worked but did not accept all the keywords it should > have, but unless you are on a XDSL-Link you most likely do not care about > specifying per-packet-overhead) > >> If you have any specific thing you are missing, let me know and > I will try to help. > >> > >> Best Regards > >> Sebastian > >> > >> > >>> - Jim > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list > >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list > >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Dave Täht > > worldwide bufferbloat report: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat > > And: > > What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast > >
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel