Honestly, you cannot draw that conclusion on cake yet. The new firmware forwarded at something like 35% better rates than the old.[1] So if you can show a dsireports speedtest on your hardware, on fq_codel, also... that would be confirmation we are winning on cake on your hardware.
[1] I have great hope that the new FIB stuff in 4.0 and later will also do magic for forwarding rates. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you all for cake... > > One of my recent pains had been that Comcast doubled my download speed to > 100mbps, and CeroWrt using fq_codel/htb couldn't hack anywhere near that > speed. > > Now I have things set using cake, and can do much better, and have my cake > and eat it too. > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/749786 > - Jim > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 21:48 , Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > It turns out that I am pulling from openwrt for luci-app-sqm, not >> > ceropackages, and overriding it was a headache. Fixed now, see below >> > >> > router# cd /tmp; wget >> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk ; >> > opkg install ./luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk >> > router # /etc/init.d/uhttpd restart >> > >> > if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces, but it worked for me, and >> > yea! cake in the gui! thx sebastian! >> >> Too cite Shaggy “Wasn’t me” ;); the initial commit was not mine >> and I do not want to claim otherwise. I basically just rearranged the >> "deck-chairs" as I tend to think. I seem to be better at the “ love for >> details” thing than the”big picture”, anyways >> Best Regards >> Sebastian >> >> > >> > >> > I tried - >> > >> > ./scripts feeds uninstall luci-app-sqm; ./scripts feeds install -p >> > cero luci-app-sqm # seemed sane, did not work >> > git rm in the feed itself did not work >> > doing the uninstall, deleting the symlink, and the git rm, nuking the >> > bin/ar71xx/packages/packages/luci-app-sqm* >> > and doing a complete rebuild... eventually did work... but strikes me >> > as a bit more brute force than I wanted. >> > >> > I am not in a position (aformentioned build is my specialized for >> > pico/nano build at the moment) to update the packages db, >> > but I stuck up the correct new package... which you can install via >> > >> > >> > Apologies for the confusion, I simply figured that the -p option would >> > work, and never checked. >> > >> > I also note that I think I am building things compile tuned for the >> > archer mips34c, rather thanthe wndr3800´s 24c. However I kept the >> > unaligned access hacks (not needed on the 34c derived archer, but >> > needed on the 24c wndr3800) >> > >> > Sigh. >> > >> > maintaining 3 separate trees for the platforms we sort of support is a >> > PITA. Then adding in something that can mesh by default on 2 others. >> > and then trying to get anything to compile for another arch entirely >> > and failing... >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 19:21 , Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Inquiring minds would like to know…. >> >> >> >> I guess, that depends on your definition of “LUCI GUI for cake”; >> >> as far as I know you can select cake in the “Queueing Discipline” drop >> >> down >> >> in the “Queue Discipline” tab of luci-app-sqm. So if the machine has the >> >> cake module and a sufficiently recent (out-of-tree) tc binary installed it >> >> should just work. Using the “Advanced option strings…” it even should be >> >> possible to pass arbitrary strings to cake (without any error checking), >> >> so >> >> I assume we are all set up for cake testing (or should that be cake >> >> tasting?) from the LUCI GUI. But I have not managed to build cake locally, >> >> nor have I dared to risk my families internet connectivity by trying one >> >> of >> >> Dave’s newer "openwrt trunk with cake” builds. So these changes linger in >> >> the ceropackages-3.10 repository until we get enough tasting to convince >> >> Toke to pull them into the openwrt repositories (these changes affect both >> >> sqm-scripts and luci-app-sqm). Dave graciously allowed me access to one of >> >> his test machines, and the changes allow to set up cake from the GUI, but >> >> I >> >> only did limited functionality testing. (And we discovered that something >> >> was of in that cake worked but did not accept all the keywords it should >> >> have, but unless you are on a XDSL-Link you most likely do not care about >> >> specifying per-packet-overhead) >> >> If you have any specific thing you are missing, let me know and >> >> I will try to help. >> >> >> >> Best Regards >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> >> >>> - Jim >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dave Täht >> > worldwide bufferbloat report: >> > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat >> > And: >> > What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? >> > https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast >> > -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
