On 04/07/2016 11:24 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
The default firmware is quite horrificly bad, isn't it?
:) Yeah. I had high hopes that they might have done something better
out of the gate.
Total
starvation of anything but the first flow, for example, in the native
tests.
Do you have the exact version number of the 1900ac's default firmware
you tested.
1900ACS not AC. Slightly different hardware. ACS is a faster CPU (
(1.6Ghz) and more RAM.
Firmware version is in the directory name. :)
'wrt1900acs_stockfw_1.0.0.169041' It was the latest firmware on the
website when I ran the tests.
However, I'd have recommended you try 900mbit to see if cake/etc does
the right things, not 975mbit.
Ok. I'll use 900 next time.
--
Richard A. Smith
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
