On 04/07/2016 04:36 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
Or I can't read properly... I have the first gen wrt1900ac. Dual-core
1.2GHz arm.
The 1900acs is 1.6Ghz. However remember my results are all local with
no cable providers in the way and thus no buffer bloat so even if the
hardware was the same. I'm not sure they compare apples-to-apples with
your tests.
It does however suggest that this box can run the higher complexity
algorithms and still maintain a lot of bandwidth.
> Is this stable enough for full-time usage (as a home router)?
Dunno. Currently on my network its a secondary device. It's behind my
primary NAT off on its own network.
It's stayed up 16d 11h so far with me running the wired flent tests and
with a few phones and tablet devices connected to it but I would not
call it very well used. Not sure when I might try and swap it in over
the WNDR3800. Messing with the stable network makes the SO unhappy. :)
--
Richard A. Smith
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
