> Well, at least one ( probably several) of the devices I have in the > new lab has *very aggressive* power save, to where babel ipv6 > multicast traffic either doesn't sync up to the AP's request for > multicast (or the sta's), or it is merely completely suppressed by the > stack. (or lost due to a bug!)...
Ok, that would explain why babeld is not falling over correctly -- since Hellos are being lost by the power management algorithm, the link quality of the redundant link is very low, so we only fall over when the currently used link has timed out rather than when its link quality has fallen below a given level. I'm still thinking it over, but right now I'm thinking that I'm not going to work around this kind of damange at the babeld level. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
