George Kaytor wrote: > > I think the guy was just trying to prevent people like you from making total > idiots out of themselves. I guess the REPUBLICAN controlled congress had > nothing to do with the prosperity of recent years? > It certainly didn't do much to help. Major successes? Let's see: failure to win a decisive majority in 1996, 1998, or 2000? Hmm. Impeachment? Score one. Conviction in the Senate? Down in flames. No, the successes of the past eight years were accomplished in spite of the U.S. Congress. (Love this stuff) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) James Smith
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in ch... David Recksiek
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) George Kaytor
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Robert Meyer
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Dan Haley
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Gary McNeel, Jr.
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) George Kaytor
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Howie Hamlin
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Gary McNeel, Jr.
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Stephen Morse
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) John Allred
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Lee Surma
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) George Kaytor
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) George Kaytor
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Dan Haley
- RE: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Raymond K. Camden
- Tarantella Christopher P. Maher
- Re: Tarantella Al Musella, DPM
- Re: Waaay OT: US elections (tongue in cheek) Judith Dinowitz
- P4 Raymond K. Camden
- Re: P4 Howie Hamlin
