I've used UltraDev since version 1. While its OK for very quick and dirty
stuff, any somewhat complex project is really too much for it. Moreover, I
find that the CF code (mainly CFScript) is very verbose and reflects its
ASP/Drumbeat origins. What I use UltraDev the most for is to develop the
interface. While there are a lot of very good SB's and UltraDev extensions
(see Massimo Foti's or Tom Muck's sites for the extensions and SB's), I
expect that version 5 or 6 of UltraDev will be much better in terms of CF
support.
regards,
larry
--
Larry C. Lyons
ColdFusion/Web Developer
EBStor.com
8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
tel: (703) 393-7930
fax: (703) 393-2659
Web: http://www.ebstor.com
http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Ultradev
i use UD & Studio together.
have been in love with DW, since its first test release.
UD has taken it one step farther.
now i admit.
i HATE cfscript that UD generates.
but that's the price for trying to cover many platforms at once.
the app. as a whole has save me weeks in development time.
but i ALWAYS fine tune the code in studio.
-paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
