etc. I'd definitely use MX 2004. I know youonly have standard, but if
youcan upgrade I recommend it - the screens based development (and other
features) are terrific.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, eTRILOGY ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Master Instructor
http://www.cfstandards.org
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> (I sent this at lunchtime but it hasn't shown up. Apologies in advance if
> duplicates happen.)
>
> I've got a couple Flash projects coming up. They won't be heavy
> programming,
> but there will be some code. One of them will store collected data to send
> to a
> database later.
>
> So my question is, should I go with MX or MX 2004? I have both (but only
> Standard for the 2004 version). I can muddle my way through
> ActionScript but
> I haven't used 2.0 much yet. In fact, I've only looked at it enough to
> know
> that it's more strict about some things which could be annoying.
>
> I'm looking to buy some books too but before I do, is it really worth
> it to
> work with 2004 or should I just stick with MX?
>
> -Kevin
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
