without any basis in law.
-Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 8:04 AM
Subject: Question
> Was watching O-Reilly last night on Fox, and he said something to the
effect
> that if the US had officially declared war on Terrorism (I dont know how
you
> do that), but if they did, then people picked up that are actively
fighting
> us, but are not wearing official uniforms are not subject to the rules of
> the Geneva Convention.
>
> What's youre take on the situation?
>
> Seems to me that an arguable case could be made that in a country-less
army
> like Al Queda that whatever clothes they are wearing, that those are their
> uniforms. And that the classic definition of sabateur may not apply.
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
