I don't know your definition of war criminal but I'd say "is responsible for war crimes" is a reasonable working definition. The UN's human rights guy seems to think that there may be a case that war crimes have been committed. If you accept Bush's responsibility for the actions of his administration then there is a reasonable case to be made that Bush is a war criminal. It's a case that has not been proven, but the proposition is far from off the wall imho.
Dana
>How's he a war criminal by the definition of the term under
>international law?
>
>-Gel
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ken Ketsdever
>
>How about War Criminals like Bush?
>
>
>
>--
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 7.0.245 / Virus Database: 263.1.0 - Release Date: 6/4/2004
[
Todays Threads]
[
This Message]
[
Subscription]
[
Fast Unsubscribe]
[
User Settings]
![]()
