If you initiate a war under false pretenses, against International will and against International law sounds to me like that might be considered a war crime.  Killing thousands of people (many if not most of whom were not combatants), destroying a countries infrastructure, permitting crimes against prisoners, detaining hundreds of people without charges, or legal represntation etc...  If the roles were reveresed we would be saying the perpetrator was a war criminal comitting crimes against humanity.

When pictures of American Prisoners were shown it was an outrage. It was humiliating against the Geneva Convention etc...  Yet we have no reservation about showing pictures of Iraqi prisoners.  Not to mention the abuse that has been documented since last fall.  


Are we going to lead by example or by force?  Bush has done more to ruin this country than Sadam or Osama could have ever done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 5:21 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Gun Control

Okies now..you know peeples say many things about Bush after this whole
Iraq thing.but.umm.
How's he a war criminal by the definition of the term under
international law?

-Gel

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Ketsdever

How about War Criminals like Bush?

--
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.245 / Virus Database: 263.1.0 - Release Date: 6/4/2004
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to