and his supporters for accusing him of lying. Even
Sen. Rockefeller admits he believed the same info that
Bush did and gave his full support for the war. Bush
didn�t lie and he didn�t pressure anyone to fudge the
facts. Even Wilson�s story was discredited from the
beginning. The Niger Uranium purchase attempt is still
being investigated.
You say, �their own corruption, misinformation and
outright lying to the public�.
Now what did they lie about? You won�t accept anything
other than guilty will you?
What do you need Al Gore to say it before you�ll
believe it?
-sm
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You make some good points, in fact those are exactly
> the reasons for a
> comparison of this with Viet Nam.
>
> When respected and patriotic military is led by
> corrupt leaders, the result is
> not just lowered morale, but demoralization. As a
> proud veteran (from Korea)
> we, in the military were bound to do our duty and
> follow the orders of the
> commander-in-chief however we were also sensitive to
> the public's perception of
> us.
>
> As for me, I have posted strong opinions regarding
> the reasons the Bush
> administration delivered to the public and to the
> congress to justify the
> invasion. What I have not done is to post an
> opinion as to doing the job now
> that we are there. Even the Democratic Platform
> contains provisions to
> completing the job that has been started. I am not
> taking part in any protest
> movements as regards the troops and the doing of
> their jobs.
>
> I think it is somewhat underhanded by anyone,
> especially the current
> administration to try to connect patriotism and
> respect for the military with
> their own corruption, misinformation and outright
> lying to the public. I only
> hope that others can see the difference.
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
