chimp to a car battery, I only have two things to say, red is for
negative and black is for positive.
As I said he was doing stroke rehabilitation work - the research
required an animal model, people could not be used at that stage. A
very promising line of research was stopped that could have helped the
thousands of people who are now paralyzed. Is that right?
So you think that destruction of private property and a person's
career is OK. There have been several deaths caused by these same sort
of terrorists. From your response you think that's OK as well then.
If you feel strong about opposing medical and scientific research
using animal subjects, may I suggest you carry a card around with you
stating such. And also stating that you will refuse any treatment that
is based on animal research. I used to pass out card that said that
to animal right protesters. I'll see if I still have any around in my
files.
larry
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:09:03 -0400, Michael T. Tangorre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had a few run ins with PETA and their sympathizers. One
> > psychologist I knw was doing some very innovative research
> > with stroke rehabilitation. That is until his lab was
> > destroyed, along with over 10 years of research records. A
> > PETA affiliated group claimed responsibility for that act of
> > terrorism.
>
> That I don't agree with one bit. I do support people's right to not approve
> of the meat industry, etc... Just as much as I support the meat industry
> people. However, violence and acts of terrorism I do not support from either
> side. It is unfortunate what happened to your friend's research.....
> Probably a humane study.
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
