"one of the administration's central arguments for a
pre-emptive war"
The Bush administration never claimed that as a reason
to go to war.
-sm
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration's claim that
Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had ties to al-Qaida - one
of the administration's central arguments for a
pre-emptive war - appears to have been based on even
less solid intelligence than the administration's
claims that Iraq had hidden stocks of chemical and
biological weapons.
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You believe what you want to believe.
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0303-01.htm
>
> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5223932
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Monique Boea
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:35 PM
> Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
>
>
> some say this... some say that..
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:32 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: OReilly vs. Moore
>
> There are intelligence sources that this comes
> from...I didn't pull it out
> of my keister.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Monique Boea
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:25 PM
> Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
>
> That is hear say.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: OReilly vs. Moore
>
> Saddam and Bin Laden loathed each other. Bin
> Laden actually wanted Saddam
> ousted and for Iraq to be a secular state.
> Guess what?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Monique Boea
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:17 PM
> Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
>
> Ok I lied, one more....
>
> Do you actually think Bin Laden and Sadaam
> were not connected at all?
> _____
> _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
