The UN had already examined all the sites that they knew were
manufacturing centers from the Iran-Iraq War. Nothing traces beyond
1998 were found. Nothing recent has been discovered, that cannot
already be accounted for. The chemical weapons were destroyed a long
time ago except for a few odds and sods that may have been left over,
such as that 155 mm artillery shell. But for that one, even the army
said that the insurgents who put it there probably did not know it was
a chemical munition.

larry

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:32:26 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The explain why there are no traces when we know they
> existed.
>
> -sm
>
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > have a look at this link
> >
> > http://www.beiresources.org.
> >
> > Gives you some idea about my current job.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > You cannot hide traces of biological or chemical
> > > > weapons that easily
> > > > or that effectively. The UN weapons inspectors
> > did
> > > > not find any real
> > > > traces.
> > > How do you know that?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How long have those special forces teams been
> > > > combing Iraq for even
> > > > traces of WMD's. How much have they found?
> > >
> > > There's some in Jordan.
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to