traces. Its simply impossible. Similarly you cannot move nuclear
weapons without someone noticing - there are still plenty of
surveillance satellites designed to pick up trace radiation.
Any biowar lab would leave enough traces that would have been found.
Look at what's been happening with the old biowar labs around
Frederick Maryland, they are still finding traces of Anthrax and
Q-fever etc. And that's after almost 30 years.
larry
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:56:34 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you can drive them to Syria. Do we know where
> Jordan got there WMD's?
>
> -sm
>
> --- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Again it's an issue of evidence. Destruction of
> > evidence leaves evidence.
> > If you had a meth lab in your basement you truly
> > couldn't get rid of
> > everything in a short period of time - you could
> > try, but forensic science
> > would catch you.
> >
> >
> >
> > By the same token if you had truly threatening
> > weapons programs, weapons
> > programs like we were told they had, then some
> > evidence would still exist.
> > You can't just "throw away" nuclear material or the
> > reports tons of Anthrax.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim Davis
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Monique Boea
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:17 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
> >
> >
> >
> > One more...
> >
> >
> > About them not being able to find WMD:
> >
> >
> > Do you think if I had a meth lab in my basement and
> > knew the DEA were on the
> > way, I would not totally get rid of any eveidence
> > that I was making drugs in
> > my house?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
