percentage of the components that break down over time. For instance
around American University in DC they are still detecting Lewisite (a
poison gas/blister agent) from where the army buried containers after
the first world war. depending on the conditions, chemical agents can
still be active - about 10 years ago about 50 Danish fishing boats had
to be decontaminated from mustard gas contamination they disturbed a
dump site from just after the first world war. But the investigators
were able to determine the age of the gas from the percentage of other
chemicals.
larry
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:58:22 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now it's recent traces? Didn't someone say they lasted
> 30 plus years?
>
> -sm
>
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No recent traces which would be required to support
> > the WMD claims of
> > the Shrubbery.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:38 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well we know he had WMD's because he used them.
> > The UN
> > > also confirmed he had them. Where did they come
> > from?
> > > No traces left of them.
> > >
> > > Again, where did Jordan get them from?
> > >
> > > -sm
> > >
> > >
> > > --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > You just cannot pick up a major lab and move it
> > > > without leaving
> > > > traces. Its simply impossible. Similarly you
> > cannot
> > > > move nuclear
> > > > weapons without someone noticing - there are
> > still
> > > > plenty of
> > > > surveillance satellites designed to pick up
> > trace
> > > > radiation.
> > > >
> > > > Any biowar lab would leave enough traces that
> > would
> > > > have been found.
> > > > Look at what's been happening with the old
> > biowar
> > > > labs around
> > > > Frederick Maryland, they are still finding
> > traces of
> > > > Anthrax and
> > > > Q-fever etc. And that's after almost 30 years.
> > > >
> > > > larry
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:56:34 -0700 (PDT), Sam
> > Morris
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Maybe you can drive them to Syria. Do we know
> > > > where
> > > > > Jordan got there WMD's?
> > > > >
> > > > > -sm
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Again it's an issue of evidence.
> > Destruction of
> > > > > > evidence leaves evidence.
> > > > > > If you had a meth lab in your basement you
> > truly
> > > > > > couldn't get rid of
> > > > > > everything in a short period of time - you
> > could
> > > > > > try, but forensic science
> > > > > > would catch you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > By the same token if you had truly
> > threatening
> > > > > > weapons programs, weapons
> > > > > > programs like we were told they had, then
> > some
> > > > > > evidence would still exist.
> > > > > > You can't just "throw away" nuclear material
> > or
> > > > the
> > > > > > reports tons of Anthrax.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jim Davis
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Monique Boea
> > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:17 PM
> > > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > > Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One more...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > About them not being able to find WMD:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you think if I had a meth lab in my
> > basement
> > > > and
> > > > > > knew the DEA were on the
> > > > > > way, I would not totally get rid of any
> > > > eveidence
> > > > > > that I was making drugs in
> > > > > > my house?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
