Perhaps but can you really destroy *all* evidence of it having been
there? It does not make sense to me.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:16:59 -0400, Monique Boea
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more...
>
>
> About them not being able to find WMD:
>
>
> Do you think if I had a meth lab in my basement and knew the DEA were on the
> way, I would not totally get rid of any eveidence that I was making drugs in
> my house?
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:13 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
>
> --- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To be fair Howie only misquoted "daddy" vrs "dad"
> > not "this was retribution"
> > (which was not claimed to be a quote) - the actual
> > misquote really does
> > nothing to change the meaning of the statement.
> >
> >  
> >
> > The statement, in context, was clearly used to
> > garner support for the war.
> > Perhaps not the "retribution" that Howie suggests
> > but bringing up history
> > with a clear, personal motivating factor can
> > definitely lead one in that
> > direction.
> >
> He was pointing out that his hatred is aimed as us and
> offered that as proof. He never implied he went to war
> because of it.
>
> "But there's no doubt his hatred is mainly directed at
> us. There's no doubt he
> can't stand us. After all, this is a guy that tried to
> kill my dad at one
> time. "
>
> -sm
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>   _____________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to